Search for: "WABTEC" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2008, 9:46 pm
A DOJ press release tells of their recent "agreement with Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (Wabtec) regarding improper payments to government officials in India in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 10:52 am by Gregory B. Williams
Following a full evidentiary hearing, the Court denied Wabtec’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction upon concluding that, although Wabtec demonstrated that it will likely prove infringement, Siemens established that it is more likely than not to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the ‘463 patent is invalid in light of the Kull prior art reference. [read post]
5 Mar 2006, 12:26 pm
Law.com has an article from the Legal Intelligencer about argument before the Supreme Court in Motor Coils MFG/WABTEC, v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 1:42 pm by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
On October 26, 2016, the DOJ announced that it will require Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (“Wabtec”) to divest Faiveley Transport North America’s (“Faiveley”) entire U.S. freight car brakes business in order for Wabtec to proceed with its proposed approximately $1.8 billion acquisition of Faiveley Transport S.A. and Faiveley Transport North America. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:38 pm by Sandy
Wabtec Corp., the Second Circuit reversed the grant of a preliminary injunction.Judge Cabranes had a fun time with this decision, which involved subway breaks. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
Wabtec Corporation, No. 08-5126 (2d Cir. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 9:01 am
 Because there was no risk that Wabtec would further disclose or irreparably harm Faiveley’s trade secrets, the court vacated the injunction and remanded the matter to the district court. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 6:29 am
WCAB (Halvorson)The Court also affirmed per curiam the Commonwealth Court decision in Motor Coils MFG/WABTEC, v. [read post]
The DOJ advised that it filed a complaint in which it alleged that Knorr-Bremse AG (“Knorr”), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (“Wabtec”) and Faiveley Transport S.A., before it was acquired by Wabtec, entered into agreements not to compete for each other’s employees (“no-poach” agreements). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 10:26 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The DOJ advised that it filed a complaint in which it alleged that Knorr-Bremse AG (“Knorr”), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (“Wabtec”) and Faiveley Transport S.A., before it was acquired by Wabtec, entered into agreements not to compete for each other’s employees (“no-poach” agreements). [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 9:37 am by Robert Vonada
(Solano) – The Employer may not take a retroactive credit under Section 204(a) of the Act until the Employer has sent the LIBC-756 Employee’s report of Benefits.Motor Coils Manufacturing/WABTEC v. [read post]